By now I assume a lot of you have heard about the conflicts between Youtube and Warner Music Group. If you haven’t,then I’ll start with a quick crash course (Skip this paragraph if you at least know what Youtube is): Youtube is a website that was created for the purpose of social networking, video blogging, and independent movie producing, among other things. Its a website where you upload a video to share it with some of the close-knit community and have them comment on it, potentially gaining a criticism or two on how to improve. As more people caught on to the website, it was bought by Google for a large sum of money, causing the creators to rake in a whole bunch of money combined with what they got for advertising. Even more people caught on after this, especially businesses who saw an opportunity to milk the cash cow for all it was worth. Some, like Viacom, set out to sue everybody involved in the website and steal a portion of their money, as well as exploiting the website for their own advertising uses. Others sought to partner with Youtube, offering videos and assistance in exchange for another portion of money.
One of these companies was Warner Music Group, and it was more instrumental to the site. Recently, though, business negotiations between the two entities have completely collapsed, and Warner Music Group has stated that until negotiations re-open, they will be removing any and all Youtube videos containing any of their copyrighted material, effective immediately. This has resulted in what can only be described as a metric fuckton of videos from various artists, including Disturbed, Slipknot, Stone Temple Pilots, Van Halen, Killswitch Engage, and Linkin Park (Meh, not too concerned about this one) being completely purged from the site.
Now, I understand that WMG needs to find ways to make money in order to keep running. I understand that when you aren’t being paid for your work, you have full license to remove it from use until payment is made. That’s basic economics. If that was all there was to it, then I’d take it in stride and just get over the fact that about 4/5 of the music I listen to is no longer available on Youtube, will not be for at least a good deal of time, and, worse comes to worst, may not even be available on Youtube any more.
Except for the fact that-you know-they’re not only removing their own material, but the material of other labels.
Recently, I checked all the dead links in my favorites, and I noticed that among all of Warner’s actual material, a bunch of my George Carlin clips, as well as a slideshow set to “Don’t fear the reaper” by Blue Oyster Cult, had been removed due to WMG copyright claims. Now, as far as I know, I might be wrong about the Carlin material. To my knowledge, the only corporate entity to exercise control over George Carlin’s stand-up routines was HBO, but maybe Warner got a hold of it as well, I don’t know. But Blue Oyster Cult’s music is owned and copyright by Sony Music Group, NOT Warner. In fact, many people have taken notice of WMG’s actions, so much so that it is even listed on WMG’s Wikipedia article.
This means that Warner Music Group has no interest in keeping its media from being used unfairly. Warner Music Group is simply trying to remove as many of Youtube’s most viewed music-related videos as possible, thus reducing traffic at a slow yet steady rate until Youtube concedes and finally gives up the bribe money. Warner Music Group is, essentially, extorting Youtube. This is not copyright enforcement, this is typical corporate bullshit in an attempt to scrounge up a few more measly bucks. It’s pathetic, and why nobody has bothered to take action against WMG (As they are clearly violating the copyright of Sony Music Group, as well as others) is well beyond me.